On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:42:38 +0800 via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> to the best of my knowledge virtually no new characters used just for > names are under consideration, all the ones that are under > consideration are from before this century. What I was interested in was the rate of generation of new CJK characters in general, not just those for names. I appreciate that encoding is dominated by the backlog of older characters. Richard.
