On 7 March 2018 at 22:18, Philippe Verdy via Unicode
<unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Additional note: the UCS will never large enough to support the personal
> signatures of billions Chinese people living today or born since milleniums,
> or jsut those to be born in the next century. There's a need to represent
> these names using composed strings. A reasonable compositing/ligaturing
> process can then present almost all of them !

CJK characters invented for writing personal names are extremely rare,
and do not constitute a significant fraction of CJK ideographs
proposed for encoding. The majority of unencoded modern-use characters
in China (that are not systematic simplified forms of existing encoded
characters) are used in place names or in Chinese dialects or for
writing non-Chinese languages such as Zhuang.


Reply via email to