On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:43 +0200, Patrik Weiskircher wrote: > Hello! > > I've got a little problem here and I'm not sure if I did something wrong > on my side or if there is something wrong with unionfs 1.0.14 (up to the > latest snapshot). > > My problem: > I have three branches mounted on /: > 0: /mnt/rw (tmpfs, read-write) > 1: /mnt/custom (ext2, read-only) > 2: /mnt/rootfs (ext2, read-only) > > I'm in my home directory. > I do a 'unionctl / --add --mode ro /mnt/test'. > This one works without a problem.
this confuses me. so you have 3 directories /mnt/rw /mnt/custom /mnt/rootfs which you union as / then you add /mnt/test so basically you seem to be trying to union a lower directory with itself. This seems to be setting you up for major pain, as you could change the union below unionfs by just modifying /mnt/test directly. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
