On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:43 +0200, Patrik Weiskircher wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I've got a little problem here and I'm not sure if I did something wrong > > on my side or if there is something wrong with unionfs 1.0.14 (up to the > > latest snapshot). > > > > My problem: > > I have three branches mounted on /: > > 0: /mnt/rw (tmpfs, read-write) > > 1: /mnt/custom (ext2, read-only) > > 2: /mnt/rootfs (ext2, read-only) > > > > I'm in my home directory. > > I do a 'unionctl / --add --mode ro /mnt/test'. > > This one works without a problem. > > this confuses me. > > so you have 3 directories > > /mnt/rw > /mnt/custom > /mnt/rootfs > > which you union as / > > then you add /mnt/test > > so basically you seem to be trying to union a lower directory with > itself. This seems to be setting you up for major pain, as you could > change the union below unionfs by just modifying /mnt/test directly.
As '/mnt' is mounted from a different partition this shouldn't effect UnionFS, correct? Patrik _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
