In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jon Masters writes: > None of these seem to handle transparently concatenating files, just > filesystems - so you can't create a file on the union which is larger > than that supported by the underlying fs. In the specific case I'm > thinking about involving Linux and MTD backed filesystems, it's a > problem - something some folks I know want sorted and something I'm > thinking about.
I'm not sure that Unionfs is the right semantics to give you, say, 64-bit files from individual file systems which only support 32 bits. Nevertheless, our Redundant Array of File Systems (RAIF) file system does support such a feature (as long as the OS natively can export a 64-bit file API). > Jon. Erez. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
