On 2/8/06, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jcm>> None of these seem to handle transparently concatenating jcm>> files, just filesystems - so you can't create a file on the jcm>> union which is larger than that supported by the underlying jcm>> fs.
> That won't even work with plain filesystems. E.g. / was 1GB, then > I would certainly have a hard time running `cat /dev/cdrom0 > /dev/cdrom1 >/tmp/xxx`. Yes, but that wasn't what I was getting at. I want to be able to have the file split over the underlying filesystems. > unionfs is not a RAIF. I know, hence it's not suitable for what I want and why I'm looking at FUSE for a solution which will need to probably get written. > Though with an extra patch by me, you can make it > behave like RAIF on a per-file-boundary basis. Do you have that patch available? Jon. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
