In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josef Sipek writes: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:12:04PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: [...] > There are two posibilities: > > 1) say: "too bad, that's not supported" (which is basically what we do now)
I won't allow us to spend substantial time developing a new branch-management method, unless it handles multiple changes atomically. > 2) add more code to unionfs to handle the case > > This makes me wonder how frequently do people want to do these kind of > complex operations? Other than Shaya, I don't know. But we are the first file systems, AFAIK, which really is a "collection" of other file systems, and hence we're dealing with new semantics never seen before in Linux. So I'd like to Do It Right [tm] the first time around. > Jeff. Erez. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
