On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:31:48PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josef Sipek writes: > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:12:04PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > [...] > > There are two posibilities: > > > > 1) say: "too bad, that's not supported" (which is basically what we do now) > > I won't allow us to spend substantial time developing a new > branch-management method, unless it handles multiple changes atomically. Ok. > > 2) add more code to unionfs to handle the case > > > > This makes me wonder how frequently do people want to do these kind of > > complex operations? > > Other than Shaya, I don't know. But we are the first file systems, AFAIK, > which really is a "collection" of other file systems, and hence we're > dealing with new semantics never seen before in Linux.
Hrm. Good point. > So I'd like to Do It Right [tm] the first time around. Sounds good. Jeff. -- Once you have their hardware. Never give it back. (The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition) _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
