On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:28:21AM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote: > Here's my optimization patch (quick and dirty, looks bigger than it is, > most of it is changing indenting of already existing code within if() > statements I added) w/ postmark numbers. I'm a little confused as now > unionfs on backing store is faster than plain backing store (albiet not > many test iterations and my methodology might be suspect, any thoughts?) Hrm, I just tried to run the regression suite on the patched code (which got commited last night) and it failed on create.sh. I am looking into it now.
Jeff. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
