Josef Sipek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:28:21AM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote:
Here's my optimization patch (quick and dirty, looks bigger than it is,
most of it is changing indenting of already existing code within if()
statements I added) w/ postmark numbers. I'm a little confused as now
unionfs on backing store is faster than plain backing store (albiet not
many test iterations and my methodology might be suspect, any thoughts?)
Hrm, I just tried to run the regression suite on the patched code (which got
commited last night) and it failed on create.sh. I am looking into it now.
the bug is (I beleive, haven't tested it yet) that I did bstart != bend
based on dentry
except that dentry in this case is the entry we want to create. In that
case, it will only have one entry. What one needs is the bstart/bend
for the parent, not or the entry. This probably gets reflected
throughout my changes in inode.c
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
