In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > 00000010
Barry, if you're getting an oops, isn't there a stack trace you can give us? Is there anything in dmesg that's helpful? Anything in any of the /var/log files? Any chance you can get us an image of your livecd to try and reproduce the oops here? With that, what set of steps should we take to reproduce the oops you get? Which unionfs2 patch did you apply precisely? Can you give me the actual name of the patch? Is it the very latest one? > Note, I would like the 2.6.21 patch to be supported/upgraded, as major > distros like Slackware 12 are and will be coming out using it, including > Puppy. Yeah, I think that's doable. I assume you want it for 2.6.21.LATEST, right? > I would also like to request being able to compile the module separately > without having to recompile the kernel. That's harder, b/c our patches include VFS-level changes that we pushed through to -mm and in some cases into mainline; these changes aim to provide better support for stackable file systems in general. But yes, the downside is that they touch some major kernel headers resulting in the need to recompile the whole kernel. > Regards, > Barry Kauler Thanks, Erez. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
