> Steph99 has presented 2 reasoned options (above), and I would argue > STRONGLY/ EMPHATICALLY that the 2nd option is the one that is applicable -- > NOT the first .
I disagree, because people with an interest in protecting such a neighborhood, I would think, would be interesting in officially cementing the the unofficial policy of the neighborhood, instead of just trusting that people would continue to care for their property in the "right" way, but who knows for sure? Well, the people in Shadyside do. I think it's unreasonable to assume any conclusion without actually talking to the residents. The best any of us can do short of that, is venture a guess at the motivations, although some previous post cited too much restriction as the reason most Shadyside residents were opposed, but I don't know where that info came from so I can't confirm or deny. In any case, it's this community's decision and studying what others have done is only helpful to a point. As we've just seen, it's easy to take the same set of facts and interpret them in wildly different ways. Does anyone have an update on whatever happened to the unanswered questions on the index cards from the meeting last week? I think they said they would answer them and distribute by email or something? ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
