Neil I. Lifson wrote: >The neighborhood is not a struggling needy one, on >the downswing, or lacking in stability. Rather, it is doing quite well on >its own, thank-you-very-much, and is a "trendy" area. > >Does this sound like Spruce Hill? I think not. > Are you saying that Spruce Hill _is_ a struggling needy neighborhood, on the downswing, and lacking in stability? That we _aren't_ doing quite well on our own?
I'll admit we aren't trendy, but the rest of that is pretty harsh. >Spruce Hill needs all the help it can get. (and this goes for all of UC). >Our battles are never-ending, and the empowerment afforded us by an HD >gives us a little more of an edge in the battle against the outside forces >impacting our neighborhood. > From what I can tell of those "outside forces," they're better equipped to meet the requirements of an Historic District than most individual homeowners. For example, they're not on fixed incomes. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
