>  That is, Shadyside ( from the descriptions provided) is a neighborhood
> with many private resources, few negatively-impacting outer forces (such as
> massive absentee-ownership and encroachment by an expanding university), a

I would argue that the universities are encroaching.  There is a lot of student
housing, but it's better maintained because it has more professors, grad
students and Carnegie Mellon students than Pitt undergrads.  I can't speak to
University construction efforts or the number of properties they owned in the
area at the time designation was considered.

> strong community base of home-owners, 

I don't know what the proportions are, but again, there is a lot of rental 
property.  There was a post-world war ii apartment housing boom, and a good 
number of houses have been converted to multi-family.

> here), well-maintained houses that (from what I can gather) have largely
> maintained their historical integrity and have not been plastered with
> aluminum siding, etc..

The neighborhood looks pretty, but I have no idea how historically correct the 
buildings have stayed.  I had (and have) little understanding of architecture 
when I was there.

> sprinkling of home-owners.  It sounds like a nightmare vision of what
> Spruce Hill could become.

Well, ok, it's not THAT bad!  It's got some cute areas and the best ice cream
place I've ever been to, a gorgeous, huge park (along the lines of
Fairmount) connecting Pitt and CMU, plus all those nice behemian features we
know and love...ethnic food stores, political activity, cool little stores and
theaters.  Gotta stick up for the old turf!  To me, Shadyside is a nightmare.  
Being there always felt like wearing a corsett.  The Squirrel Hill model is
worth coming back to: comfy, clean, diverse, pleasant, not too pricey.  The key
here is stability, effort and pride.  I'm not sure, but I think I agree that
more homeownership is the way to make that happen.  I think very tangible
improvements like better litter and crime control are effective ways to
encourage that kind of growth.  I'm still not convinced that HD is the right
tool for the job of giving absentee landlords the boot.  Seems like there ought 
to be a more exact and effective way to deal with that problem.

Again, given the same information, different people will come to different 
conclusions.

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to