On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 11:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, 25% of the actual HOUSES or PROPERTIES in this example are owner-occupied,Unless the "units" are condos, in which case they count as properties even though there is only one physical unit.
not the 10% that would be suggested when looking at "housing units".
Other than the Mews, do we have any condos in UC? Garden Court itself, I guess - did that conversion really ever happen? The Farifax?
Of course then I guess the "condo association" would count as the resident property owner... unless the developer still owned the property, in which case he would likely be a non-resident owner...
... aah, tis never as simple as one would desire.
T.T.F.N.
William H. Magill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
