|
Obviously, if you reduce these matters to pure dollars and cents your
argument seems logical. Having a strong historical commission should help
prevent the decay of these old structures so that they do not become so
dilapidated that they require massive amounts of cash to repair. Reducing
these matters to dollars and cents is a simple minded approach to fixing this
problem posed by simple minded people who see no value to preserving historical
architecture. The loudest mouths in this issue are those seeking to
extract as much rent out of as many students as they can before these 100-200
year old buildings fall down around them. I am all for affordable housing
but the buildings in university city and powelton village ARE NOT
AFFORDABLE!!!! Taken as is they cost a fortune to heat, a fortune to
insure, and a fortune to repair even negating historical correctness.
Either agree to tear them down or sell them to people who care about them and
can afford to care for them properly.
FSarlo
|
- Re: [UC] Cost of "historically correct" work POOKtd
- Re: [UC] Cost of "historically correct" wo... Andrew Diller
- Re: [UC] Cost of "historically correct" wo... Anthony West
- Re: [UC] Cost of "historically correct"... Brian Siano
- RE: [UC] Cost of "historically correct&... S. Sharrieff Ali
- Re: [UC] Cost of "historically correct" wo... Krfapt
- Re: [UC] Cost of "historically correct" wo... Dan Myers
