Dan Myers wrote:
Anybody up for a mass move to Canada?
Oh, come off it. Why is it that liberals always talk about moving to Canada when elections go horribly wrong? When you really think about it, doesn't this make liberals look, well, kind of stupid?
First of all, I never heard conservatives talk about relocating when Democrats win. Okay, a few-- but they talk about relocating within the U.S., usually to crackpot-friendly empty spaces like Montana or Idaho.
And second... why _Canada_? Why not Europe? I mean, if you're going to leave the country, why settle for Canada? Why not move to a place with more than a thousand years of intense, fertile, and profound history, stocked full of fabulous architecture and exotic foods, where your kids can grow up learning five or six major languages and where the rails can take you to the greatest museums, vacation spots, and cultural landmarks of Western Civilization?
But no. They'll settle for _Canada_.
I am utterly disgusted....I thought this country knew what was good for them. Obviously, they are interested in making themselves look smarter by having a dumb president. It's really pathetic. I am hoping for a recount. Florida decision was made quite quickly this year, possibly to avoid cynicism.
Why avoid cynicism? _Embrace_ it. We've just had solid proof that a bare majority of the country really is cataclysmically, profoundly stupid, and that even the _worst President in living memory_ can get re-elected.
If you _still_ want to avoid cynicism, even after _that_ piece of evidence, well, good luck.
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
