I would say the majority favor it. In a message dated 12/29/2004 1:10:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, Andrew Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I would say that the Majority of the people who reside in West Philly are >against this idea of a historic district, and that it is only the >relentless drumbeat of this dead-horse-issue by people like yourself that >make it an issue at all. > > >--On Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:27 PM -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> preserving. � However, in the past couple of �years, one libertarian and >> frugal landlord, and a few others who are not happy �about various local >> issues (some related to historic districts, and some not �related), have >> mounted a very vocal campaign to derail the Philadelphia �Historical >> Commission's processing of the nomination of Spruce Hill as a >> Philadelphia local historic district. � There may be others behind the >> scenes who are �also interested in stopping the process. > >-andy diller >one of 'the few' > >---- >You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see ><http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
