I'm too busy to expend the effort to prove the point - again. After all, it has already been documented by the Spruce Hill poll.
If you want to prove the point the other way - I'll volunteer to help you canvas, but since you have the axe to grind - you should organize the effort. I'll be a volunteer canvasser on your team. Good luck in putting together the rest of the team. Let me know when I'm supposed to show up. In a message dated 12/29/2004 4:38:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >In a message dated 12/29/2004 4:17:21 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, � >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >Tell you �what Al. I'll be a volunteer canvasser on your team. Good luck in >putting �together the rest of the team. > >Let me know when I'm supposed to show �up. > > > >I thought you said you believed the pro-HD people were in the �majority. So, >surely you can substantiate your beliefs by getting ten of them �together, to >meet with ten of us anti-HD types, to plan an unbiased �questionnaire and go >out as pro-anti teams to get the data we need to decide �this question for >once >and for all. > >The answer above is flippant. You want to get the empirical evidence one �way >or the other... or continue to play silly games? � > >Always at �your service and ready for a dialog, > >Al �Krigman > > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
