In a message dated 12/29/2004 1:32:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Re: historic designation of Spruce Hill) I would say the majority favor it.
We can find out. House-by-house canvassing by teams representing both views, using a questionnaire agreed upon by both, to keep things from becoming too Ukrainain or too much like that highly prejudicial SHCA mail ballot.
 
You put together a team of say, 10 volunteers from the pro-HD side and I'll get an equal number from among those who think it's a terrible idea. Then we'll have empirical evidence rather than suppositions by those who claim that special state of grace that goes with the flag they planted on the moral high ground.
 
How about planning to kick off a series of sessions to develop an unbiased questionnaire in early February, with the actual canvassing to be done the first two weeks of March?
 
I'll take a refusal to accept this offer for exactly what it's worth.
 
Always at your service and ready for a dialog,

Al Krigman

Reply via email to