[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really. Although Ray is undoubtedly stating the idea this way to
stimulate discussion, he's right. You probably wouldn't circulate two
petitions, but anyone truly interested in determining popular sentiment
would prepare some kind of unbiased survey that allowed respondents to
express their views in a way that could be analyzed to obtain a reliable
result. A survey prepared by a group having representatives on both
sides, and circulated by just such a group -- all to avoid as much bias
as possible. This, by the way, is what I've suggested on numerous
occasions for gauging the local sentiment vis-a-vis HD or HD vs NCD.
all part of a recurring pattern?
( p e r c e i v e d c r i s i s )
self-selected self-defined appeals to
non-elected solutions in city govt costs
members of --> the name of --> without --> borne
local n'hood public good real public by all
organizations (dog run, hd) mandates
( r e s u l t i n g c i t i z e n s h i p )
.........
laserbeam�
[aka ray]
focp : dog run :: uchs/shca : historic district
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
