Re: [UC] Abbraccio and Dahlak

[KAREN ALLEN]

If you compare the size of the rear yards of the adjacent Baltimore Avenue 
properties, you will notice that they are very small.  The backyards of the 
Dahlak properties are taken up by the addition Amare built, which go right 
up to the property line.  The land beyond the property line belongs to 
Abbraccio, so the problem is until Dahlak buys or rents the land, they're 
trespassing on someone else's property.
Karen Allen

From: Victor Fiorillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Victor Fiorillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vincent/Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        University City List 
<univcity@list.purple.com>,        Pfsni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [UC] Abbraccio and Dahlak
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:15:42 -0500

Are you suggesting that it is improper or illegal for Dahlak to use the 
back
door as an entrance?  I can understand your complaint about Dahlak using 
the
area for seating, hanging out, but not the back entrance issue.  What�s the
problem with that?

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.