You know what is odd to me. Melani posted a second press, fairly important,
release dated June 8.
June 8, 2007
University City District has made numerous documented attempts to contact
John Fenton asking him to respond to the matter under investigation. Our
calls and letters have gone unanswered. He still remains on paid
administrative leave.
If UCD released this press release June 8, why would the University City
Review refuse to publish it in the editor's note in the June 13 issue?
This seems very odd indeed. I feel bad that with the tremendous effort made
by UCD to get out this press release, even the University City Review
refused to publish the information in the editor's note.
It's such a short sweet press release. Let's be thankful Melani got it.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "University City List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [UC] Notes from Planning Committee Meeting Re: UCD 6-13-07
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did the media do anything at all, or should we assume that they didn't
find it newsworthy?
this week's ucity review mentioned the thursday meeting in a small column
that begins at the bottom of the front page:
[manually re-typing this, 'scuse the typos]:
From the Editor:
Last Thursday, June 7th, the University of Pennsylvania
Office of City and Community Relations held the last First
Thursday Meeting of the season at the 40th Street branch of
the Free Library.
The major topic of the meeting scheduled was to be on
"Healthy in Philadelphia," but instead took quite a
different course. The meeting rapidly turned into a public
airing of the dissatisfaction Councilwoman Jannie Blackwell
-- who spoke at the meeting -- and much of the community
represented at the meeting felt concerning the alledged
"mismanagement" of a variety of issues by the University
City District and the University of Pennsylvania.
Unfortunately, the story that was scheduled to run was not
available at press time and will be published in next week's
6/20/07 University City Review.
Also, much has been circulated over the internet, and even
by word of mouth about the University City Review "hosting"
or "moderating" a public forum on these issues.
While it is true that we offered our services at the meeting
in this regard, as an objective party, it is also true that
we will only participate once all responsible parties have
come together in agreement about the purpose, structure,
ground rules and venue of such a meeting. --RC
- - - - - - -
ucity review hasn't mentioned anything else about the fenton incident
since their original may 23 article about it
the summer dp hasn't mentioned anything about the incident since their
original may 24 article
the daily news article that appeared june 1 after its original article may
16 shifted the focus away from ucd and onto blackwell.
all in all, it's odd, how the official story is on hold, yet we're given,
meanwhile, sifted morsels of information in timed bits...
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[aka laserbeam®]
[aka ray]
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
"It is very clear on this listserve who
these people are. Ray has admitted being
connected to this forger." -- Tony West
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database:
269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 6/13/2007 12:50 PM
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
