Sorry, Ray to have not responded personally.

Karen and Al commented on your foto and I must say in a residential area
that image would be incongruous.

My Visual Literacy is still developing.  As a music person, I am primarily
auditory. 

In addition, my eyesight has been poor since the age of six from a near
fatal case of measles.

However, Ray¹s, foto made it so even I could understand it.

On 11/23/07 1:33 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In a message dated 11/23/2007 1:17:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> It is an  excellent photo, Ray.  Ditto the thanks.
> The proposed Lussenhop's Folly is even worse than this, of course.
>  
> The Radian extends away from those dinky properties where non-owner-occupants
> dare to live -- and presents its elongated towering facade along the already
> unattractive Walnut and Sansom Streets. Lussenhop's Folly runs along the
> building on Pine Street and across the backs of those on Baltimore Avenue,
> doing much more damage in both cases to the visual aesthetics for pedestrians
> and the people who live in its figurative and sometimes literal shadow.
>  
> Reminds me of the lady in Atlantic City who got lots of national press
> coverage because she wouldn't sell her house to the developers and ended up
> hemmed-in closely on three sides by five or six stories of casino. The latter,
> incidentally, eventually got torn down because the developers didn't really
> know what they were doing (and lost more than their shirts). As developers
> frequently don't (know) or do (because they generally have little invested of
> their own compared to what they talk other people into putting up -- not
> always by being totally truthful).
>  
> Always at your service & ready for a dialog,
> Al Krigman -- 36-year local resident, housing provider, and -- even my
> opponents admit -- bon vivant
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Check out AOL Money  Finance's list of the hottest products
> <http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001>
> and top money wasters
> <http://money.aol.com/top5/general/ways-you-are-wasting-money?NCID=aoltop00030
> 000000002>  of 2007.
> 


Reply via email to