Kimm is arguing Frank can command everybody else in University City to
to reveal their financial records and publish them on UC-list, while he
can keep his own financial records secret.
Nonsense like this is why nobody takes UC-list seriously. Frank, the
notorious UC public advocate, must live by the legal rules all other
public advocates live by. If Frank violates the law in a way that
threatens powerful opponents, he'll be busted.. Not my idea! But if
Frank's political payroll is clean .. then he's clean.
-- Tony West
Tony,
You are so out of line.
No, as a private citizen who chooses to exercise his right of
self-expression on a matter of public interest, Frank is not obligated
to bare his personal, private information in order to gain passage to
some right to express his opinion. His right to express his opinion
and speak his mind on any matter that pops into his head is protected
by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, and the last I checked
the Constitution did not appoint you gatekeeper to check the
credentials of who can express their opinions or whose opinions matter.
Kimm
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
