emko wrote:
Every resident should have an equal voice at community meetings.
exactly. when barry grossbach publicly announced this
meeting and established shca's public process, he said
nothing about which neighbor's voice counted more or less.
in fact, he said "all comments will be taken into
consideration".
and when tom lussenhop subscribed to this list, we said
nothing about which neighbor's voice counted more or less.
in fact, it was his choice to privately email people on this
list in response to posts they had made, his choice to meet
with people, privately over coffee, to discuss his proposed
hotel.
* * *
on wednesday night shca hosted a public process, governed by
their own ground rules, in which lussenhop and the neighbors
were allowed equal time to present their points of view,
publicly. the neighbors and lussenhop honored that process,
publicly, and now shca must honor the outcome, publicly.
I can see how some people aren't happy that wednesday's
meeting was such a clear and irrefutable demonstration of
public opposition to lussenhop's hotel, or that the dp
published this -- but I can't see how anyone can equate that
with ad hominem onlist, or how resorting to ad hominem
onlist now can possibly change what happened publicly.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
