Anthony West wrote:
SHCA's published position on the hotel is perfectly reasonable. Until
pending litigation is settled, its Zoning Committee has no idea what
proposal will actually wind up before it. Why weigh in on a proposal
whose details later turn out no longer to exist? There are other things
to do and time is limited.
??
what litigation was involved when shca first presented the
plan at their members election meeting without announcing
that it was on the agenda? or when shca called for a public
meeting about the plan at a venue that would accommodate
only about 20 people?
shca claims to stand for the neighbors and behaves
otherwise. and it's not because of pending litigation.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
