Yes, this amendment makes a technical change in the way the penalty is
assessed, but makes no change in what is allowable or prohibited
posting on street lamp posts, trees, utility poles, etc.
Elliot
On 26 Mar 2008, at 1:36 PM, John Ellingsworth wrote:
Bill
There is ANOTHER amendment pending on this issue, which may or may
not be related to concerns about the impact:
http://webapps.phila.gov/council/detailreport/?key=8158
It maybe in response to some of the concerns about streetspam.
Thanks,
John Ellingsworth
2008-03-26
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like
less than half of you half as well as you deserve." - Bilbo Baggins
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Bill Sanderson wrote:
Hmm - wonder how high this item is on the Mayor's agenda:
---
SECTION 2. On or before March 31, 2008, the Mayor shall submit to the
Council
President a report evaluating the effectiveness of this ordinance
and its
impact on the
quality of life in the neighborhoods of the City.
---
-----Original Message-----
From: John Ellingsworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:20 AM
To: Bill Sanderson
Cc: 'University City List'; 'UCneighbors'
Subject: Re: [UC] RE: [Ucneighbors] the truth about signs and trees
Here is the text to the amendment:
http://webapps.phila.gov/council/attachments/3265.pdf
_______________________________________________
ucneighbors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.asc.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/ucneighbors
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
Elliot M. Stern
552 South 48th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029
United States of America
telephone: 215-747-6204
mobile: 267-240-8418
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
