In a message dated 8/11/2008 4:40:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KAREN ALLEN wrote: > Thanks, Glenn, for posting this. > > The minutes simply report the names of the people who testified in > opposition. There is NO reporting of what was said. How can the > Commission or outside parties review the differing positions fairly if > the reasons for the opposition are not reported??? > > Andd you're right, Glenn, your name isn't even listed!!! There is a "Ben Boyer" listed among those introduced by David Fineman. I suspect that the person taking the minutes misheard it. They got mine wrong, too. Considering that Mr Fineman provided the list it writing and also supplied the Commission with the prepared text of all of our testimonies, these minutes do not instill confidence that this Commission is meeting the new level of responsibility assigned to it by the mayor. A Commission with weighty responsibilities should provide transcripts of proceedings for the public record that ensure a paper trail that gives their decisions verifiability. Instead, the sloppy record of the hearing tells us that it's business as usual. Al Krigman reminding you that you read it first, here, on the popu-list **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )
