It is nice to be able to read meeting minutes on the Web. When a meeting
organizer has paid staff, why not post them? Lean on PP directly and see
if that prods them to get some up.
But the normal place for minutes is still face to face, at a subsequent
meeting. Minutes are, strictly speaking, an aid for the next meeting.
Their purpose is not to substitute for attending meetings.
Non-decisional meetings don't require minutes; however, any discussion
that calls for progress should provide them.
Perhaps people should sort out their priorities here. People whose chief
goal is to stamp PennPraxis as unhelpful, probably should avoid
attending any meeting it facilitates, since they would then run a risk
(however small) of actually being helped by PennPraxis.
People whose chief goal is to weigh in on a political choice, though,
are generally helped by attending pertinent meetings, no matter who
chairs them and how the minutes come out; especially if those people
believe they have force of numbers on their side.
-- Tony West
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
Anthony West wrote:
So, are you for more meetings or against more meetings? Take a stand,
concisely. More meetings, or no more meetings?
yes, let's see more meeting minutes!
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
