I'd also like to mention that our new website is designed for this very
discussion:
http://www.friendsofclarkpark.org/?p=278


On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Brian Siano <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd also like to point out that the news item on our website is _notifying_
> the community about an issue that will have some impact on Clark Park. As I
> wrote, the new Parks and Rec Department has not settled on its new events
> and permit policies. The FOCP's Large Events Committee (comprised of the
> people who host the Large Events (May Fair, the festivals, the flea markets,
> Woodland Ave. Reunion) has developed a schedule of events, we're not certain
> what Parks and Rec will do about the permits.
>
> The issue with the insurance coverage is still, at this point, a _possible_
> concern. As Darco pointed out, this is a requirement that the Fairmount Park
> Commission had for its parks; Rec hasn't had this kind of requirement. But
> now that these organizations are merging, it _may_ become a standard
> requirement. But we don't know yet.
>
> But this may be a good opportunity to ask for some advice. Let's say that
> Parks and Rec enacts this insurance requirement. Some of our Large Events
> hosts have the mans to obtain insurance coverage, but others (like the
> Festivals) don't. There must be some mechanism by which an organization can
> obtain coverage for a one-off event. If there is, we can add it to our Large
> Events FAQ so people can continue to hold events in the park.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Lalevic, Darco <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> I guess my point is, I don’t see what is changing here and now that you’re
>> pointing out with the article on the FOCP website. I certainly agree with
>> you that government as a whole is encroaching on private rights – it’s been
>> atrociously bad since 9/11 (everything from the patriot act to the FCCs
>> recent ruling).
>>
>> But no, according to Philadelphia code, a permit IS permission – and in
>> fact it is against the law to hold an event on public park space with
>> greater than 75 people without a permit. Of course that’s not to say the
>> police wouldn’t harass smaller groups. But it’s not like that never happened
>> before – remember when the RNC was in town? If you’re going to bring the
>> supreme court into this, you’ll lose as almost every decision in the last 30
>> years has encroached on personal rights.
>>
>>
>>
>> And every event I’ve held has been a non-profit event held under a 501c3,
>> and they still made me pay for police (who often enough weren’t even there).
>>
>>
>>
>> So, yes, while I agree with you that it does occur, my point is I don’t
>> see evidence of that one article pointing to a particular crackdown in Clark
>> Park.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to