They aren't because they were not specifically with park-support groups. You are twisting my words. Perhaps it's why observing this thread on the listserv had become so muddling to me.
On 6/19/11 9:46 AM, "Anthony West" <[email protected]> wrote: >Wilma, > >I cited four neighborhood groups in University City which have been >vigorous advocates for specific parks. Which of these cited >"gentrification" as the reason why they supported improving their park, >in your experience? Are there other park-support groups in UC I have >missed, which you can think of? > >If your experiences with park-support groups do not include experiences >with any of the actual park-support groups in UC, then how are your >experiences relevant to what UC's park activists have been doing? > >Cheers, > >--Tony West > > >On 6/19/2011 9:34 AM, Wilma de Soto wrote: >> One: I was speaking in particular to the various "Friends of.." groups >>in >> UC. >> >> Two: I was stating what they were doing that has part of MY experience >> with them. >> >> Three: Please don't sprinkle in names like Malcolm X Park and Barkan >>Park >> to try to diminish or disregard my experiences. It's too much like >> Republicans saying how much they dislike President Obama, but saying how >> wonderful Herman Cain is. > >---- >You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see ><http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
