Once again, Glenn attempts to confuse history to fit his imagination. The yearly supplemental maintenance, which Tony referred to in 2009, is performed by Moon Site Management and was paid for by the Party for the Park. As we've said before, they've sprayed fertilizers on the park. Glenn insists that the fertilizer was a "poison," and lately, he's insisting that this was actually Roundup all along.
The landscaping in the Park A reconstruction, where Roundup was used on one occasion two months ago, was performed by landscaping contractor hired by Parks and Recreation. Two different landscaping companies, hired by two different entities, performing very different tasks. It's not confusing, and Tony's outlined this before. And if Glenn reads these things as closely as he pretends, then his weird questions for Darco below can only be read as an attempt to obfuscate and confuse the issues. On 6/20/11, Glenn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/20/2011 4:20 PM, Lalevic, Darco wrote: >> >> I can certainly attest that from what I've seen, the FOCP board was as >> surprised (actually probably more so) as you regarding the recent use >> of roundup. >> >> Given that the contractors are hired by the city, through the Park >> Dept., it's unsurprising that the FOCP wasn't aware of it. >> > > Darco, > > Here is what Tony West said about the contractors on 9/29/09 in a > response to one of my previous reports of chemicals used in Clark Park. > There seems to be a serious contradiction about hiring the contractors! > Are you correct or is Tony West correct? > > People will wonder why there is so much confusion over such a simple > question about who hires the contractors! > > "...The guys who were hired are Moon Site Management. They are the > reason the trash is removed twice a week rather than once a week during > the peak season. They are the reason the grass in the park is mown more > than once every 2 months in the peak season. And they are the sole > reason the grass gets any maintenance at all; your tax dollars purchase > ZERO lawn care ever, for our neighborhood's most cherished and most > heavily used and abused lawn..." > > > Darco, are you claiming that the Parks department has actually hired > these contractors since the beginning of the "Party for the Park" and > the plot to redesign?? If these companies were hired by the city, as > you say; they may be compelled to allow us to investigate their work > orders so that we can determine what chemicals were used in Clark Park! > We have a right to request government documentation according to the PA > right to know law! Of course, special service districts and insular > civic associations never allow accountability or review of their records. > > Wow, I'm really excited to learn who has hired these mysterious > contractors of the past decade! > > > If the Party for the Park does not fund the outside maintenance > contractors, however; can your sources disclose the use of the Party for > the Park money ??? I'm sure when you discover the truth, you will see > why people are concerned about what chemicals they've been exposed to > over the years since the first corporate "Party for the Park" > > > Thanks, > Glenn > PS: Your comments have matured greatly since our last communications! > Darco, I was extremely disappointed that you'd chosen the FOCP tactics. > > > > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
