Patrick Dixon;208569 Wrote: > Although this may seem a bit of a pita, in the long run, if you are > going with a linux machine, you will be better off not using ntfs. > Although there is some support for ntfs in linux, AFAIK it's been > reverse engineered and up until about a year ago (when I last looked) > it was read only anyway.
NTFS read/write support, at least in Ubuntu, is provided with a fairly new package called ntfs-3g. Yes, it is a kludge. You won't have the jounalling, self-checking and robustness you'll get with ext3. -- Mark Lanctot 'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!' (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910&postcount=2) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35851 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix
