>>Quote:
>>Originally Posted by vrobin View Post
>>Your setup looks totally marginal.
>
>I'm afraid I have no clue why you are saying this?

I meant: what you want to achieve/do is very uncommon and specific.

>>Quote:
>>Originally Posted by vrobin View Post
>>I know SB and SC are good... but not that good as somebody 
>>wants to use SB Screen and SB Remote to drive a totally 
>>different sound player.
>
>Again I am not sure I understand this :P I want to drive a 
>different sound card because for me SB3 is not good enough. 
>I am saying this from an audiophile perspective. Price/quality 
>ratio of SB3 is splendid of course!

I meant: squeezebox is a nice piece of hardware, squeezecenter is a
nice piece of software, but they are not "the best of all on the
surface of the earth" (there are better hadware/software). 
Somebody who wants to play media files through brutefir+a soundcard
digital out and control it with a "hand device" has many other
(simpler?) choices like drive any dlna software with a pda or itunes
with an itouch (or anything like this).


>>Quote:
>>Originally Posted by vrobin View Post
>>Maybe you should use some pda/itouch/jive remote (when it 
>>comes) to control a softsqueeze that plays through your 
>>soundcard.
>
>I agree this is an alternative I should look into! :)

Don't you want a mac+itunes with a nice soundcard? ;)

It would be less strange than using squeezebox+its remote as a simple
ir receiver+nice lcd panel (as in the setup you want, squeezebox is
nothing less than an ir receiver+lcd display).

>>Quote:
>>Originally Posted by vrobin View Post
>>I'm not sure SB digital output is "that bad" but for sure it 
>>won't do what you're trying to do with brutefir. It sounds 
>>like you're having fun, but if I were you, I would better buy 
>>a nice upsampling dac... of course for digital crossover it 
>>will cost you a little money ;)
>
>I am certainly having fun playing with all this. Brutefir 
>corrects my room response and I can't live without it anymore! 
>So in the end I am not using brutefir for fun but for obtaining 
>a high end sound.

It sounds strange for me. As a light audiophile and strong music lover,
I try to banish everything that changes the signal. A few years back I
banished GraphicEQ to keep "untouched sound" for the same reason. Why
bought expensive pure cables if before the sound get through it, it's
change by many mathematics equations!
For the same reason (and long listening tests/experiences), friends of
mine put their Tact devices on ebay.

>I do have a Apogee Mini DAC, it doesn't upsample though and I 
>don't see any reason why I would want it to... In my experience 
>upsampling sounds different but not necessarily better.

My only experience with upsampling is 3DLab D/A Converter (192k
upsample) and foobar secret rabbit and they both are very positive
experiences...

>Also I don't see why digital X-over would cost me money, 
>I will use brutefir for this as well..

I was talking about hardware digital filters that AFAIK costs a lot of
money.

Regards,
Robin


-- 
vrobin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
vrobin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11705
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40526

_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to