vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > I meant: what you want to achieve/do is very uncommon and specific. > Ah ok, I understood the opposite :P But yes you are right, this is very specific!
vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > I meant: squeezebox is a nice piece of hardware, squeezecenter is a > nice piece of software, but they are not "the best of all on the > surface of the earth" (there are better hadware/software). > I agree, however I like the concept of Squeezebox/slimserver very much and I did not find anything (regardless of price) that I liked better, execept for the Transporter of course ;-) vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > Somebody who wants to play media files through brutefir+a soundcard > digital out and control it with a "hand device" has many other > (simpler?) choices like drive any dlna software with a pda or itunes > with an itouch (or anything like this). > Going the pda route is certainly an option I am looking into! :) vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > Don't you want a mac+itunes with a nice soundcard? ;) > No because pc hardware is much cheaper and I am not very fond about itunes either. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > It would be less strange than using squeezebox+its remote as a simple > ir receiver+nice lcd panel (as in the setup you want, squeezebox is > nothing less than an ir receiver+lcd display). > I don't agree. It is the slimserver software that makes the SB3 so succesfull in my opinion. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > It sounds strange for me. As a light audiophile and strong music lover, > I try to banish everything that changes the signal. > The depends on how you look at it. In my view the room changes the sound a lot, therefore I think using room correction is not changing the sound but making up for the alteration that already happened. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > A few years back I banished GraphicEQ to keep "untouched sound" for > the same reason. > Thats a totally different thing, especially if you are just "guessing" of what to equalize and how much. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > Why bought expensive pure cables if before the sound get through it, > it's change by many mathematics equations! > Again this depends on how you look at it, see above. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > For the same reason (and long listening tests/experiences), friends of > mine put their Tact devices on ebay. > In my case it is a clear improvement. I did not try the Tact devices. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > My only experience with upsampling is 3DLab D/A Converter (192k > upsample) and foobar secret rabbit and they both are very positive > experiences... > I guess it is a matter of taste and also it will vary depending of the combination of devices you have in your setup. I have nothing againts upsampling , I just do not see a reason why I "need" it. vrobin;245098 Wrote: > > I was talking about hardware digital filters that AFAIK costs a lot of > money. > You are right of course, but since I have a pc I do not need this extra hardware :-) Thanks for your replies and tips! Regards, Ronald -- tingtong5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40526 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix
