I have used squeezeslave very successfully with DSL 3.0. It has a MUCH lower overhead than softsqueeze. Of course you don't get the fancy screen, but that didn't make any difference to me.
Once you start up squeezeslave there is no way to stop it other than killing the process, there is NO interaction with it at all. I've been able to get DSL and squeezeslave to work on anything I tried it on including some very low power old systems. Squeezeslave was actually much easier to setup than softsqueeze. John S. -- JohnSwenson ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43343 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix
