OK, it turns out that I had Fedora 10 on my WindPC, so our systems ought
to be very similar.  My setup:

2gigs RAM (I think)
OS system disk is a 2.5" SATA 80gig laptop drive
Music library is a 3.5" SATA 1T drive, formatted NTFS

Short answer: SBS 7.6 seems to work fine on the WindPC with Fedora 10. 
I get no sense that the system is "overwhelmed" or that SBS 7.6 is too
resource intensive for the hardware.

Observations:

Before installing, I uninstalled SqueezeCenter, and disabled my custom
SqueezeCenter svn code service and the mysqld and lighttpd services I
had configured on this box:

Code:
--------------------
    
  #yum erase squeezecenter
  #chkconfig squeezecenter_trunk off
  #chkconfig mysqld off
  #chkconfig lighttpd off
  
--------------------

I then downloaded and installed SBS 7.6 from today's nightly:

Code:
--------------------
    
  mkdir /setup
  cd /setup
  wget 
http://downloads.slimdevices.com/nightly/7.6/sc/30841/squeezeboxserver-7.6.0-0.1.30841.noarch.rpm
  rpm -Uhv squeezeboxserver-7.6.0-0.1.30841.noarch.rpm
  
--------------------

I then fired up a browser (from a windows client) and completed the SBS
web setup wizard, setting the music folder & playlist folder, etc.

I then ssh-ed into the windpc and stopped the squeezeboxserver service
and then deleted the sqlite db files:


Code:
--------------------
    
  # service squeezeboxserver stop
  # rm /var/lib/squeezeboxserver/cache/squeezebox-persistent.db
  # rm /var/lib/squeezeboxserver/cache/squeezebox.db
  # rm /var/lib/squeezeboxserver/cache/ArtworkCache.db
  # service squeezeboxserver start
  
--------------------

..and then restarted the squeezeboxserver service.

I find this just ends up being a cleaner approach after installing a
new instance of Squeezebox Server.

Anyway, these are the results of the 1st completed scan:


Code:
--------------------
    
  Squeezebox Server Status
  Version: 7.6.0 - r30841 @ Tue Jun 1 03:04:26 MDT 2010
  Hostname: squeezenas
  Server IP Address: 192.168.xxx.xxx
  Server HTTP Port Number: 9000
  Operating system: Red Hat - EN - utf8
  Platform Architecture: i686-linux
  Perl Version: 5.10.0 - i386-linux-thread-multi
  Database Version: DBD::SQLite 1.29 (sqlite 3.6.22)
  Total Players Recognized: 0
  
  Library Statistics
  Total Tracks: 51,201
  Total Albums: 2,735
  Total Artists: 565
  Total Genres: 35
  Total Playing Time: 3726:14:57
  
  Music Scan Details
  Discovering files     (5160 of 5160)   Complete  00:00:21
  Scan new files        (4360 of 4360)   Complete  01:23:41
  Discovering playlists       (1 of 1)   Complete  00:00:00
  Pre-caching Artwork   (2725 of 2725)   Complete  00:09:09
  
  The server has finished scanning your music collection.
  Total Time: 01:33:11 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010 / 10:51 AM)
  
--------------------

This is not significantly different than what I was seeing with SC
7.3.4 with a custom MySQL instance handling the database chores.  I'm
guessing that I'd see quite a bit of improvement with those scan times
if I had an ext2 file system on the 1T audio library drive rather than
NTFS.  The ntfs-3g file system driver seems to occupy a top position
under # top during scanning, consuming almost as much CPU time as
squeezeboxserver.

I then connected my Transporter to the windpc and started experimenting
with playback.  Playback is flawless.  If anything, because my library
is almost completely whole-album flacs with embedded cuesheets, SBS 7.6
is LESS resource intensive than SC 7.4.3: transcoding is no longer
necessary for this audio format.

About the only glitch I've noticed is that, initially, the
Transporter's IR remote seemed "sticky".  After I started playback,
however, the stickiness went away and now all is as it should be.

Verdict: SBS 7.6 + Fedora 10 + WindPC == OK.


-- 
gharris999
------------------------------------------------------------------------
gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79256

_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to