Triode wrote: > So that file may change sample rate in the middle - squeezelite will > only look at the sample rate for the first frame at present. Its > currently saying it is 44100. > > > > This suggests the system is lacking cpu power or the output thread is > not getting enough time. Is it running as root or with the output > thread able to run as real time? The buffer values you are using look > far too large - what hapens when they are default? Isn't this causing > the process to use virtual memory!??
I reverted to 0.8beta 1 and 0.9 beta5 and got the same slow playing issue. I guess I never played that album with SL. (16/48 is weird anyway, that's a CD rip.) I don't want to discourage my system, please don't say it lacks power :) May I ask what are the semantic differences between the 2 buffers ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ epoch1970's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16711 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97046 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
