JackOfAll wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. That's not a bad start, at least 96k works. We > might be able to use different divisors for the higher rates. (And to be > honest I had zero expectation that 176k4 or 192k would output anything > at all. ;)) > > EDIT: 'SampleRateTest.tgz' > (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/files/SampleRateTest.tgz) > The archive contains a file from the Bink Audio Test CD, (this is the > right channel, this is the left channel, this is both channels), at 32k, > 44k1, 48k, 88k2, 96k, 176k4, 192k, 352k8, and 384k. This is what I use > to test specific sample rates.
Can we check the server version and streaming format for the high rate case? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
