JackOfAll wrote: > Well, nofail is ignored, in as much as the the remote share not being > available will not stall the boot process anyway. But, and this is > mainly cosmetic, by using nofail and the share not being available, > systemd won't mark the mount as having failed and the remote-fs.target > as having failed. You have effectively told it that it is allowed to > fail without being an error, by using nofail.
OK - got you. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slackhead's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13963 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
