Rob P wrote: > BrutefirDRC Flac 96khz/24 bit, FFT filter lenght 32768 samples (16384 > taps)
Would you say that the WB responds quickly with this load, for example when seeking or switching tracks in LMS? As I recall it, the future CSP hardware aims to bypass the DAC chip's internal filters, so that JohnSwenson's filters can be used instead. The internal filters are only bypassed at the highest sampling rates; 352.8 and 384 kHz. Again, as I recall it. Would it be possible for you to test these sampling rates? If so, does the WB respond quickly then? Does anyone remember if JohnSwenson's filters are/will be implemented in hw or sw (probably)? If in sw (SoX?), does anyone know how it affects the performance? In other words; would this be possible to run at the highest sampling rate, at the same time as using BrutefirDRC, in terms of performance? Is the WB that powerful? (I hope so!) Best Regards, Gandhi not often enough well recorded and mastered cds *|* dbpoweramp with accuraterip *|* flac *|* fanless asrock z77e-itx intel i5-3570t *|* ubuntu 12.04.1 lts 32-bit *|* lms 7.8.0 *|* brutefirdrc 3.0 *|* transporter (balanced out) *|* thule ia252b *|* audio physic scorpio *|* no fancy cables. *+* also some booms. *+* harmony 525s for them all, including waking the server from s3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gandhi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58909 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
