Ron Olsen wrote: > > The version of LMS in the Community Squeeze testing repo > Logitech Media Server Version: 7.9.0 - 1407484868 @ Fri 8 Aug 10:03:39 > BST 2014 > has this bug fixed. > > It might be worthwhile to make the "7.9.0 - 1407484868 @ Fri 8 Aug" > version available in the Community Squeeze repo, not just the testing > repo.
Ron, This may seem silly or pedantic, but it is important! (Especially if you are going to put up public wiki pages! ;)) This new repo is to be named *Squeeze Community*, not *Community Squeeze*. If you could update your wiki to reflect that, I'd appreciate it. Secondly, I've not publicly announced this repo yet. Just asked for a couple of testers who were using the old CS repo, which has been offline for several months now, to check that installing the new SC repo packages results in an upgraded system. Not that this stops anyone from using it, just that the backup web server hasn't been sync'd to the primary yet, so I haven't been "trumpeting" it's existence from the rooftops, just a low key post here asking for a couple of the old CS users to check that the migration path, installing the new repo package works OK. (Some work was still going on last night on the main server, or more specifically to the VM which is hosted on that server, which required a reboot or two..... Until announced as being "live" there may be service disruptions.) Thirdly, I have absolutely no issue with VB users using the repo on top of VB. Just one thought.... I hope to hell this doesn't break any specific package config that Andrew, (you or others), might have added specifically for VB to the VB packages. I suspect that whether it is LMS or squeezelite, or whatever software package we are going to talk about, that will be available in both repos, the one in SC is likely to be a later version and replace the VB version. I will move the LMS packages from testing to "stable" tomorrow. Only pulled latest git and made them a few hours ago. Typically I test myself for a day or two before moving packages from testing to stable. SC will be tracking 7.9 git and only 7.9 git. When CS was last being updated, 7.8.0 was in stable repo, 7.8.1 in testing repo and 7.9 git in unstable. All the time 7.9 git is looking stable, I see no need to "track" anything other than that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101931 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
