JackOfAll wrote: > Ron, > > This may seem silly or pedantic, but it is important! (Especially if you > are going to put up public wiki pages! ;)) > This new repo is to be named *Squeeze Community*, not *Community > Squeeze*. If you could update your wiki page to reflect that, I'd > appreciate it. >
Thanks for the nomenclature correction. I updated the VortexBox wiki page to use the correct repo name. > > Secondly, I've not publicly announced this repo yet. Just asked for a > couple of testers who were using the old CS repo, which has been offline > for several months now, to check that installing the new SC repo > packages results in an upgraded system. Not that this stops anyone from > using it, just that the backup web server hasn't been sync'd to the > primary yet, so I haven't been "trumpeting" its existence from the > rooftops, just a low key post here asking for a couple of the old CS > users to check that the migration path, installing the new repo package > works OK. (Some work was still going on last night on the main server, > or more specifically to the VM which is hosted on that server, which > required a reboot or two..... Until announced as being "live" there may > be service disruptions.) > Understood that this is a "work in progress." > > Thirdly, I have absolutely no issue with VB users using the repo on top > of VB. Just one thought.... I hope to hell this doesn't break any > specific package config that Andrew, (you or others), might have added > specifically for VB to the VB version of the packages. I suspect that > whether it is LMS or squeezelite, or whatever software package we are > going to talk about, that will be available in both repos, the one in SC > is likely to be a later version and replace the VB version. > Testing of Squeeze Community LMS 7.9.0 by VB users has revealed no breakages so far. Several VB users have asked for a 7.9.0 version, and Andrew won't get around to creating a VB 2.3 version of LMS 7.9.0 until he gets back from vacation in 10 days. I'm not sure what changes Andrew currently makes to LMS, but last time I checked, they were minor. I seriously doubt that using Squeeze Community LMS 7.9.0 and squeezelite 1.6.4 are going to break anything on VortexBox 2.3. > > I will move the LMS packages currently in testing, from testing to > "stable" tomorrow. Only pulled latest git and made them a few hours > ago. Typically I test myself for a day or two before moving packages > from testing to stable. As far as LMS is concerned, SC will be tracking > 7.9 git and only 7.9 git. When CS was last being updated, 7.8.0 was in > stable repo, 7.8.1 in testing repo and 7.9 git in unstable. All the time > 7.9 git is looking stable, I see no need to "track" anything other than > that. Thanks for the info, and many thanks for your hard work in making Squeeze Community LMS 7.9.0 available on Fedora 20. VortexBox users who are using this version are quite pleased with it; see http://vortexbox.org/forum/vortexbox/general/56982-community-lms-7-9?p=57025#post57025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ron Olsen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9233 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101931 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
