My sugestions about a rational testing method ? Was that negativity ? You can sugest a completely of the chart thing to test , who knows really .
But it is the choice of testing methods that matters most . There is also this , if you make an extraordinary claim you better have the corresponding extraordinary evidence. If would just accept that iumping of building would kill me without a peer reviewed paper :) But for example differences between digital sources are non existing in controlled tests ? At the moment . ( these digital sources of course playing the same flac file or CD ) In my own system i can change say that my Meridian DVD-A player my Pioneer bluray or my saueezebox SB3 or my Squezeebox Touch probably performs identical with 16/44.1 the A/B testing i did was not at the highest standard ABX with severL people involved . But this was annexpected result . Ig ive found large diffrences aka a very unexpected result I have to investigate much more before claiming fanstic results with my noodling ? -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106252 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
