Mnyb wrote: > My sugestions about a rational testing method ? Was that negativity ? > > You can sugest a completely of the chart thing to test , who knows > really . > > But it is the choice of testing methods that matters most . > > There is also this , if you make an extraordinary claim you better have > the corresponding extraordinary evidence. > If would just accept that jumping of building would kill me without a > peer reviewed paper :) > > But for example differences between digital sources are non existing in > controlled tests ? At the moment . > ( these digital sources of course playing the same flac file or CD ) > > In my own system i can say that my Meridian DVD-A player my Pioneer > bluray or my saueezebox SB3 or my Squezeebox Touch probably performs > identical with 16/44.1 the A/B testing i did was not at the highest > standard ABX with severL people involved . But this was an expected > result . > > If ive found large diffrences aka a very unexpected result I have to > investigate much more before claiming fanstic results with my noodling ?
What claim did I make? I said what I heard ( period ) I made no claims as to what anyone else would hear or any claims. You guys are off the chart ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106252 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
