> Sure, I did fsck several times, but it still said something about an"overlapped extent allocation (file 107114d)" yet still claimed it was repaired successfully.
I would suggest finding and deleting that file.
God, I hate HFS+. If Apple would only do Mac FS emulation on top of UFS: using hidden files to hold the finder info and resource forks, this could be done above the file system layer and give you Mac FS semantics on top of any file system, even over the network.
I'd love to run UFS-only, especially now that Panther has picked up a more recent UFS.
I have to ask: what are we missing by sticking with HFS+, which would be improved by switching to UFS? I'm asking this question out of complete ignorance, not some agenda.
-- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
