Re: [uportal-dev] Portlets and CAS

[Eric Dalquist]

So Pascal Aubry pointed out http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/PLT/Portlets+using+Proxy+CAS which has a very good write-up on how they have done exactly this. Their approach looks like passing the PGT in as a portlet preference to portlets that declare the correct preference name in their portlet.xml.

-Eric

Jen Bourey wrote:

I'd like to get feedback on what people think of passing the PGT to the portlet as a preference versus a user attribute versus a request attribute. Also how should the naming of the key be decided?

Thanks!

- Jen


On Nov 27, 2007 4:16 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The discussion was captures here:
http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/UP-1873

-Eric


Jennifer Bourey wrote:

Hi all,

We had some discussion at the unconference about proposed ways of
handling proxyCAS from portlets.  I have to admit that I don't
remember the entire discussion, and I'm not sure we reached a firm
conclusion.  Now that we're presumably back from the conference /
holidays, could we maybe continue that conversation on-list?

- Jen


---------------------------------
Jennifer Bourey
Technology and Planning
Yale University ITS
203.432.5718

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature