Jen, would you outline the process you used to get it to work? I'm trying to do this same procedure, but I'm not seeing the proxy ticket passed in via prefs.
Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jen Bourey > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 9:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] Portlets and CAS > > Thanks Eric! I've now successfully gotten ESUP Portail's > CCasProxyPortletAdapter working in the Yale portal. It seems > to work quite well. I wasn't sure where the code for the cas > bean was, so I just used the low-level Java CAS objects to do > ticket validation by hand in the portlet. As to the key > naming issue, the code for CCasProxyPortletAdapter allows the > key name to be overridden via a channel parameter. > > What do other people think of this approach? Is this > something we'd like to add to the uPortal codebase in the > near future? > > - Jen > > > > On Nov 28, 2007 3:50 PM, Eric Dalquist < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So Pascal Aubry pointed out > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/PLT/Portlets+using+Proxy+CA > S which has a very good write-up on how they have done > exactly this. Their approach looks like passing the PGT in as > a portlet preference to portlets that declare the correct > preference name in their portlet.xml. > > I'd like to get feedback on what people think of > passing the PGT to the portlet as a preference versus a user > attribute versus a request attribute. Also how should the > naming of the key be decided? > > -Eric > > > Jen Bourey wrote: > > Thanks! > > - Jen > > > On Nov 27, 2007 4:16 PM, Eric Dalquist > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The discussion was captures here: > http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/UP-1873 > > -Eric > > > Jennifer Bourey wrote: > > > Hi all, > > We had some discussion at the > unconference about proposed ways of > handling proxyCAS from > portlets. I have to admit that I don't > remember the entire discussion, > and I'm not sure we reached a firm > conclusion. Now that we're > presumably back from the conference / > holidays, could we maybe > continue that conversation on-list? > > - Jen > > > --------------------------------- > Jennifer Bourey > Technology and Planning > Yale University ITS > 203.432.5718 > > > > > > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] > as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings > or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
