Jen Bourey wrote:
+1 for renaming.Wouldn't it be possible for people to do an svn switch rather than a fresh checkout if they so desired?- JenOn Feb 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we want to address. I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path something we need to worry about? -Eric -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
